Alasan Nurul Ghufron Minta MK Ubah Masa Jabatan Pimpinan KPK Jadi 5 Tahun

Jakarta –

Vice President of KPK Nour Al-Ghufran He submitted a judicial review in the Constitutional Court regarding the term of office of the KCP leadership from four to five years. Guvron admitted that this was done so that the KCP’s leadership period would be compatible with other state institutions.

“I demand justice in accordance with the Constitution 45, Article 27 and Article 28d, so that the term of the presidency of the KCP is the same as in 12 other non-ministerial state institutions,” Guvron told Detik Kom on Tuesday (16/d). 5/2023).

Guvron said that it has submitted judicial review since early November 2022. Initially, Guvron filed judicial review in Article 29 Letter E of Law 19/2019 on the Commission for the Eradication of Corruption regarding the minimum age requirement for KPK leaders to be 50 years.

He said, “After entering the process of examination and reform, I added the subject of JR, which is Article 34 of Law 30/2002 in conjunction with Law 19/2019 regarding the KPK leadership period, which is set at four years.”

In his judicial review of Article 29 H regarding the minimum age for KPK party leadership of 50, Guvron argued that this limit is unconstitutional. He was deemed to have fulfilled the administrative requirements and declared himself ripe to serve as the leader of the KPK.

For the record, in the article’s judicial review, Guvron requested the requirement that KPK leaders be 50 years old or have served as KPK leaders.

Then what about Givron’s reasons for the judicial review that asked the Constitutional Court to change the term of office of the KCP leadership to 5 years?

There are three reasons why Gufron asked the Constitutional Court to change the term of office of the KCP leadership from four years to five years. First, he referred to Article 7 of the 1945 Law related to the period of rule in Indonesia which is in the period of 5 years.

“The legal ideal as stated in Article 7 of the 1945 Constitution, the term of government in Indonesia is 5 years, so the entire term of government should be 5 years,” he said.

Guvron also compared tenures in 12 non-ministerial government institutions such as Komnas Ham and Boaslu. It is known that dozens of state institutions have a mandate for their leaders for 5 years at a time.

“12 non-ministerial government institutions (auxiliary government bodies), e.g. Komnas HAM, ORI, KY, KPU, Bawaslu, etc., every 5 years. Thus, they violate the principle of justice as in Article 27 and Article 28d of the 1945 Constitution (unconstitutional) if not corrected / equalized, said Guvron.

On the latter reason, Guvron said that the KPK’s four-year term of office is contrary to the National Development Plan contained in Law No. 25 of 2004. He considered that changing the term of office would also equate the KPK’s eradication of corruption program with that of the government. National development plan.

“The time period for national development planning according to Law 25/2004 is 25 RPJPN years, and the 5-year RPJMN will have consequences for the development monitoring and evaluation planning, so if the Corruption Eradication Program is 4 years, it will be difficult and not synchronized with the assessment,” Gavron said. The results of its performance in eliminating corruption.

Ghufron added that his party is still awaiting the court’s decision from the Constitutional Court on judicial review.

“The process of trial of data from the People’s Assembly and the President has been completed, expert evidence has been completed and conclusions reached. Currently we are waiting for the reading of the decision. We do not know when the decision will be read out, we are waiting for the schedule from the office of the clinical MK.”

(ygs/zap)